Guatemala

Intersectoral Dialogue Table on the Culture of Peace and Reconciliation

The "Intersectoral Dialogue Table on the Culture of Peace and Reconciliation" was a participatory citizen initiative that began in 2002. Its objective was to identify the minimum requirements that a country needs to begin a process of reconciliation in response to the commitments made by the State during the Peace Accords. Approximately, 115 people participated in a dialogue lasting about a year, which resulted in an action plan and concrete proposals for its implementation. This public policy followed the four documents of consensus that were delineated during the intersectorial dialogue, in addition to the guidelines agreed upon by the different sectors of the Guatemalan society: the Culture of Peace, State-Society Relations, the Evaluation of compliance with the recommendations of the Commission for Historical Clarification and Reconciliation. This participatory initiative is part of a series of six intersectorial working groups created in 2002 during the Guatemala Consultative Group Meeting in Washington ? a meeting of national and international representatives who supported the process of national reconciliation. These dialogue tables were spaces for deliberation and consensus, which gave rise to public policies and initiatives that supported the implementation of the commitments of the Peace Accords.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case