Argentina

Management Board of the Memory Park

The Management Board for the Memory Park and the Monument to the Victims of State Terrorism is an entity conformed by members of the government and the civil society - which includes representatives from the University of Buenos Aires and from the main Human Rights organizations- that is in charge of the management and procurement of the Memory Park and the Monument to the Victims of State Terrorism. The Board was formally created in 2009 through the enactment of the Law No. 3.078 and it is considered a decentralized area of the Human Rights Undersecretary of the City of Buenos Aires. Among its primary functions, the following stand out: the development, monitoring and updating of the information related to the disappeared and assassinated during the period of State terrorism, as well as managing public policies that promote collective memory. Regarding its operation, the Board is financed by the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires and it is managed by an executive director which is proposed by the Board itself and is formally designated by the local Executive Power. The internal affairs are decided by simple majority and the Board members stay in office for three years.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case