Honduras

Sectorial Board for Drinking Water and Sanitation

The Sectorial Board for Drinking Water and Sanitation is a space created to promote dialogue and negotiation between the Government and the civil society. Its main goal is to strengthen policies, national plans, and support the implementation of the Strategic Plan for the Modernization of the Water and Sanitation Sector (Span. PEMAPS) through a sectorial approach. The boards are composed by representatives of the Government, of the community that supports the boards, and of the civil society. The latter participates in the Sectorial Board in order to know the progress and difficulties of the process, to follow up on the national agreements and to make proposals for greater compliance. The sectorial round tables were established in the framework of the Principles of the Stockholm Agreement that arose during the second meeting of the Consultative Group for the Reconstruction of Central America in May 1999. By 2016, the Sectorial Board for Drinking Water and Sanitation had become a fundamental axis for the development of that sector in Honduras. Under the tutelage of the board, the Strategic Plan for the Modernization of the Water and Sanitation Sector (PEMAPS) was deliberated and promoted.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case