Participatory Budget of San Pedro's Justice System
The Participatory Budget of San Pedro's Justice System was an initiative that involved citizens, representatives of the Supreme Court of Justice, the Public Ministry and the National Police. The project first selected those in charge of carrying out a participatory diagnosis of the justice system from civil society organizations and interested persons. The diagnosis identified failures in the system and prioritized actions. Discussion groups were held, which resulted in the formation of a round table for the elaboration of the Participatory Budget. It was made up of representatives from civil society and public institutions. Based on the participatory diagnosis, the plenary presented budget proposals to the corresponding authorities.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- only backed by a governmental program or policy
- Frequency
- single
- Mode of selection of participants
- restricted
- Type of participants
- citizens civil society
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a binding decision
- Co-Governance
- yes
Means
|
Ends
|
