Strategic Plan for Zonal Development (PLAEDEZ) - Montevideo
The Strategic Plan for Zonal Development (PLAEDEZ) - Montevideo is one of the instruments that forms part of the participatory planning of public policies in Montevideo. It is a flexible working guide to help orient the development of Montevideo for five years, reflecting the needs, challenges and important projects that the neighbors identify. It is also an important source for the planning of public budgets, especially for the participatory budget. Beginning in 1994, a dialogue began with the residents of Montevideo to consult on their priorities for the planning and development of public policies, which were then expressed in the "Management Commitments". This began to be institutionalized from 1999, when the first PLAEDEZ was developed, under the motto: "To continue constructing, we must imagine Montevideo". It was a five-year plan (similar to the Public Budget). The same was done for the periods of 2005-2010 ("I love you Montevideo") and 2010-2015 ("More Montevideo"). For its development, 18 Zone Planning Teams (EPZ) are formed, which are composed of regional politicians, technicians and members of the Neighborhood Councils. PLAEDEZ is developed in four stages, of which two stages include citizen consultation at the local level through assemblies, meetings, surveys and other participatory instruments. There are also training workshops for EPZs. The main themes are: accessibility, mobility and transport, quality and environmental sustainability, economic and productive development, housing and social integration, cultural projection, infrastructures and basic services, territorial development, institutional development and citizen participation.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- only backed by a governmental program or policy
- Frequency
- regular
- Mode of selection of participants
- both
- Type of participants
- citizens civil society
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision
- Co-Governance
- yes
Means
|
Ends
|