Uruguay

Development of the National Biosafety Framework National Coordination Committee (CNC) and Working Groups

In 2001, Uruguay adhered to the United Nations "Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety". In 2004, the "Development of the National Biosafety Framework" project URU-04-009 was started, with support from the United Nations Environment Program and the Global Environment Facility, which promote projects of the same character in more than 100 countries. The project had to include civil society participation, so that from 2005, a National Coordination Committee (CNC) was established, a multi-sectorial entity open to the participation of representatives of institutions and organizations with competencies and interests in aspects related to the development of modern biotechnology. This also included representatives from the government, academic, business, NGO and producer and worker organizations. The CNC had to contribute to the basic understanding of all those aspects required for the formulation of the proposed National Biosafety Framework, as well as to ensure a transparent development of the process. In addition, working groups were established for the discussion on sectorial aspects of the problem from the CNC, but they were open and joined by more stakeholders. In September 2007, the final report, "Proposal for a National Biosafety Framework for Uruguay" was published, which was an input to a biosafety law.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
both 
Type of participants
civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case