Plebiscite / Referendum Epistolary Vote
A plebiscite was held to decide on the constitutional reform that would allow Uruguayans to vote from abroad, a proposal that had the name of "Epistolary Vote." The initiative was carried out mainly by the Frente Amplio as part of a policy of inclusion of the diaspora. The "Epistolary Vote" reached 37.42% of the votes cast, which means that the reform was rejected.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- embedded in the constitution/legislation
- Frequency
- single
- Mode of selection of participants
- open
- Type of participants
- citizens
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a binding decision
- Co-Governance
- yes
Means
|
Ends
|
