Brazil

Deliberative Council on Coffee Policy

City/State/Region
Begin – End: 1996 – ongoing
Name of organization in charge: Ministério da AgriculturaPecuária e Abastecimento
Type of organization in charge: government
Level: national

Impact

?

Implementation: was the innovation effectively, partially or not put into practice at all?

Fulfillment of Aims: were the goals of the innovation completely, partially or not achieved at all?

Output: has the innovation generated recommendations, initiatives, decisions or policies?

Outcome: if there were a policy output, was it enacted or implemented?

Implementation: yes
Fulfillment of Democratic Innovation’s aim: yes
Output: yes
Policy Outcome: yes

The Deliberative Council on Coffee Policy (CDPC) was created in 1996 by Decree 2047 and modified on two occasions, by Decrees 4623 and 10071. It is a collegiate body in which, in addition to representatives of Ministries, representatives of industries and cooperatives linked to the production and trade of coffee participate. The Council operates within the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Supply, and its main duties include approving: policies and programs for the coffee sector, the cultivation plan for the sector, the National Program for Research and Development of the Coffee Sector, the adhesion of members to the Brazilian Consortium for Research and Development in the Coffee Sector, and the budgetary allocations assigned to the sector's Economic Defense Fund. In addition, the Council endorses actions aimed at promoting a balance between the supply and demand of coffee, and establishes technical and financial cooperative actions with national and international organizations working in this sector.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization: only backed by a governmental program or policy
Frequency: regular
Mode of selection of participants: restricted
Type of participants: civil society private stakeholders
Decisiveness: democratic innovation yields a binding decision
Co-Governance: yes

Means

Deliberation
Direct Voting
E-Participation
Citizen Representation

Ends

Accountability
Responsiveness
Rule of Law
Political Inclusion
Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting

Formulation and decision-making

Implementation

Policy Evaluation

Sources

https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/politica-agricola/cafe/conselho-deliberativo