Colombia

National Councils of Agricultural, Fishing, Forestry and Aquaculture Production Chains

The National Councils of Agricultural, Fishing, Forestry and Aquaculture Production Chains come from a strategy of the Colombian Government to consolidate the process of internationalization of the country?s economic opening in the early 1990s, due to the fact that it showed weaknesses in the country's productive structure. The strategy is based on sectorial policies and was promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture initially with the introduction of public-private competitiveness agreements, which was later formalized with the creation of a legal framework that led to the creation of Productive Chain Organizations, each of which has a National Council of Production Chains and one or more Regional Chain Committees. The National Councils of Agricultural, Fisheries and Forestry Production Chains have in principle the status of advisory bodies of the National Government in matters of policy for the sustainability and competitiveness of the corresponding sub-sector, and are made up of representatives of producers, marketers, distributors, the respective agricultural, fishery or forestry industry and the Government. The Productive Chains can be created with a process of application and approval by the Ministry of Agriculture. By 2014 there were 37 nationally formed national channels, with their respective National Councils.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case