Unique Negotiation Table with the National Government
The Unique Negotiation Table between the National Government and the Agrarian Summit was convened on several occasions (initially in the period 2014-2016 and then again in 2018) and had mediation by the United Nations Organization. However, on several occasions the Agrarian Summit left the negotiating table because it considered the government's implementation of the agreements reached to be void or insufficient, and called for protests. Topics addressed at the negotiation table were the peace building process, threats, persecution and assassination of social leaders, and legislative reform proposals, such as tax reform.
Institutional design
Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?
Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?
Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?
Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?
Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?
Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?
- Formalization
- only backed by a governmental program or policy
- Frequency
- sporadic
- Mode of selection of participants
- restricted
- Type of participants
- civil society
- Decisiveness
- democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision
- Co-Governance
- yes
Means
|
Ends
|
