Costa Rica

Dialogues for the Costa Rica of the Bicentennial

Dialogues for the Costa Rica of the Bicentennial is a series of spaces for deliberation arising from the need to build a national vision on the future of the country that would materialize in the National Development Plan of 2006-2010. These dialogues would consist of commitments assumed by the Government to foster a broad pluralistic discussion on issues that are essential for the future of the country, often controversial or highly complex. The Dialogues sought to be, above all, a way of seeking solutions for all through processes of debate and broad social participation. Within the framework of the commitment for the initiative of the Dialogues for the Costa Rica of the Bicentennial, the proposal of the Bicentennial Project would be developed. This proposal sought to complement the deliberative instrument provided for in the National Development Plan (Span. PND), with a mechanism for monitoring and evaluating medium- and long-term objectives, targets and indicators. This mechanism, installed in the institutional framework of the Ministry of National Planning and Economic Policies, reintroduces the importance of long-term planning and prospective analysis in the institution's regular tasks. The Dialogues would revolve around the following themes: Social Policy Axis; Productive Policy; Environment, Energy and Telecommunications; Institutional Reform and Foreign Policy. However, these dialogues did not materialize because political conditions at the time did not allow for this.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case