Costa Rica

Regional Plan for the Territorial Planning of the Greater Metropolitan Area, 2013-2030

The Regional Plan for the Territorial Planning of the Greater Metropolitan Area (Span. Plan GAM) 2013-2030, is the name of the process for updating the Urban Development Plan of the Greater Metropolitan Area (GAM), 31 years after taking effect. The process had a first phase between 2005 and 2012 during which the Regional Urban Plan of the Greater Metropolitan Area of Costa Rica (PRUGAM) was first developed, followed by the Land Management Plan for the GAM. The Regional Urban Plan of the Greater Metropolitan Area of Costa Rica (PRUGRAM), for example, had an open and multisectoral participation process, carried out through a series of workshops to review the existing situation in urban planning and development and to further direct the urban development of Costa Rica. In addition to the Central Government, various autonomous institutions, public universities, municipal governments, the private and community sectors and NGOs all took part in this participatory process. In November 2013, the GAM Plan was submitted to a public consultation through the website mivah.go.cr, in order to find out whether or not the Plan required any adjustment before being approved at the end of December 2013. In 2014, the Regional Plan for Territorial Planning of the Greater Metropolitan Area was published, PLAN GAM 2013-2030.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a non-binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case