Dominican Republic

Boards of Security, Citizenship and Gender

The pressure for the creation of the Boards of Security, Citizenship and Gender began in 2005, and since then civil society organizations have been trying to engage in a closer and more coherent dialogue with the Dominican government on issues of social insecurity, particularly regarding the issues of violence, women's rights and community development. Up to 2011, two seminars and five open forums were held to define the problems and design the institutionalized means to address and solve those problems. Decree 121-13, signed by President Danilo Medina Sánchez in 2013, formalized the creation of several premises and a national working group on security, citizenship and gender issues. The groups are composed of a representative of the Ministry of Interior, the mayor, the Ministry of Public Affairs, the police, the governor, two representatives of civil society and non-governmental organizations. The national working group receives quarterly reviews of local groups, reports on implementation stages and citizen participation in the process. At both levels, the groups are - among other functions - in charge of coordinating and recommending strategies for the prevention of social insecurity, supporting security policies, soliciting and supporting citizen participation as well as the formulation of policies that support inclusion.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
embedded in the constitution/legislation 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens civil society private stakeholders  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields a binding decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case