Ecuador

1800 - Crime

1800-Crime is a tool that promotes citizen participation in the enforcement of security and rule of law. It started in 2009 by the joint initiative of the Ministry of Interior and the Ecuadorian national police and works as a confidential hotline for citizens to provide information about felonies. The purpose of the hotline is to open a pathway for citizens to break their silence and establish direct and safe relationship with the police, thus exercising their rights as contributors to the safety of their communities. Some examples of information provided are: descriptions of perpetrators, addresses, car plaques, or details about the modus operandi of criminals. The information is then verified and sent to specialized units and investigation may follow. Once the details have been confirmed, a report is issued for the Ministry of Interior, which in turn decides upon the monetary reward to be paid to the denouncer. The service emphasizes its high confidentiality and guarantees the safety both of callers as well as of agents working for the hotline. Over the years, the administration has broadened the range of topics for which felonies may be denounced over the hotline, including issues like corruption, organized crime, asset laundering, details on the most wanted criminals, and temporary national emergencies like wildfires.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
only backed by a governmental program or policy 
Frequency
regular
Mode of selection of participants
open 
Type of participants
citizens  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
yes 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case