Ecuador

Democratization, Rights and Intercultural Dialogue for Ethnic Inclusion in Northern Border Areas of Ecuador

The Democratization, Rights and Intercultural Dialogue for Ethnic Inclusion in Northern Ecuador is an initiative promoted by the International Organization CARE, with funding from the European Union and in collaboration with the International Center for Advanced Studies in Communication for Latin America (Span. CIESPAL). The project seeks to contribute to the strengthening of processes aimed at overcoming ethnic and gender oppression in indigenous and Afro-descendants, supporting culture and communication and rights as a condition of democratization processes, revaluation of diversity and interculturality and socio-economic development. In particular, it seeks to strengthen cultural expressions that contribute to the enhancement of cultural diversity, intercultural dialogue, ethnic and gender equality, and the exercise of human and cultural rights of indigenous and Afro-descendant populations in the northern border region of Ecuador. Processes of democratization of the country. The project was carried out between 2014 and 2016. It involved 8150 people from different communities, such as Awá, Kichwas and Afro-descendants, among others, and the results obtained include the training of cultural agents from different populations and the dissemination of its cultural heritage through cultural recovery and the production and promotion of interculturality.

Institutional design

?

Formalization: is the innovation embedded in the constitution or legislation, in an administrative act, or not formalized at all?

Frequency: how often does the innovation take place: only once, sporadically, or is it permanent or regular?

Mode of Selection of Participants: is the innovation open to all participants, access is restricted to some kind of condition, or both methods apply?

Type of participants: those who participate are individual citizens, civil society organizations, private stakeholders or a combination of those?

Decisiveness: does the innovation takes binding, non-binding or no decision at all?

Co-governance: is there involvement of the government in the process or not?

Formalization
not backed by constitution nor legislation, nor by any governmental policy or program 
Frequency
single
Mode of selection of participants
restricted 
Type of participants
citizens  
Decisiveness
democratic innovation yields no decision  
Co-Governance
no 

Means


  • Deliberation
  • Direct Voting
  • E-Participation
  • Citizen Representation

Ends


  • Accountability
  • Responsiveness
  • Rule of Law
  • Political Inclusion
  • Social Equality

Policy cycle

Agenda setting
Formulation and decision-making
Implementation
Policy Evaluation

Sources

How to quote

Do you want to use the data from this website? Here’s how to cite:

Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2017). LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.

Would you like to contribute to our database?

Send us a case